Architecture Upgrade Program (Modular Monolith First)
Last Updated: 2026-02-28
Audience: Engineering leads, backend/frontend engineers, release owners
Status: Completed baseline program (feature-freeze track)
Objective
Upgrade the existing system architecture to align with industry best practices for:
- scalability
- flexibility
- operational reliability
- performance
- maintainability
while intentionally pausing net-new features until architecture foundations are stable.
Target Direction
Use a Modular Monolith as the primary architecture target before any microservice split.
Why this direction:
- lower operational complexity than early microservices
- faster stabilization and refactor velocity
- cleaner boundaries and dependency control
- easier testing and observability rollout
- preserves optional future extraction paths
Program Phases
Phase 0: Architecture Freeze + Baseline (current)
Scope
- Freeze net-new features (except critical security/bug fixes).
- Establish baseline metrics and current-state architecture inventory.
- Identify boundary smells, duplicate paths, and high-risk coupling.
Deliverables
- As-is architecture map and domain inventory
- Ranked flaw list (severity + impact + migration risk)
- Baseline metric capture method (latency, errors, queue, test reliability, env drift)
- No-feature execution checklist
Exit Criteria
- Baseline report published and accepted
- Top architecture risks explicitly prioritized
- Owners assigned for first structural refactor wave
Phase 1: Target Architecture + Standards
Scope
- Define target modular blueprint (C4-lite + module boundaries).
- Define mandatory architecture standards and rules.
Mandatory Standards
- one canonical runtime path per concern
- strict typed config contract (env validation is single source)
- explicit contracts at boundaries (schema-first I/O)
- observability-by-default for critical operations
- deprecation policy and ADR-first architecture decisions
Deliverables
- target module boundary map
- architecture rulebook
- dependency direction rules
- refactor acceptance gates
Exit Criteria
- Rulebook approved
- module boundary ADR accepted
- migration sequence locked for Phase 2
Phase 2: Structural Refactor (2–4 weeks)
Scope
- Restructure into clear domains (chat/runtime/tools/memory/queue/auth/protocols/files).
- Remove overlapping runtime paths and dead compatibility branches.
- Enforce dependency direction (core domains must not depend on adapters/infrastructure).
Deliverables
- module-by-module refactor PR sequence
- anti-drift tests for boundary import constraints
- reduced cross-domain coupling in orchestration layer
Exit Criteria
- circular dependency risk removed from critical paths
- documented canonical path for runtime/tool/queue
- anti-drift checks passing in release gate
Phase 3: Reliability + Performance Hardening (parallel)
Scope
- Stabilize observability and SLO-oriented operations.
- Profile and optimize top bottlenecks.
Deliverables
- per-stage latency visibility with stable interpretation
- queue backlog and failure visibility
- tool denial visibility by reason and protocol context
- baseline SLO targets and error budget draft
- bottleneck optimization backlog (DB, queue throughput, prompt/runtime overhead)
Exit Criteria
- operational diagnosis possible without code spelunking
- performance baseline and target deltas documented
Phase 4: Release Governance + Future-Proofing
Scope
- Lock architecture discipline into release process.
- Prepare future extraction seams without premature service split.
Deliverables
- mandatory curated release gate usage
- architecture guard checks in CI
- future extraction playbook (criteria-based, not trend-based)
Exit Criteria
- governance checks enforced consistently
- extraction criteria documented for future scale events
Target End-State Criteria ("Good Enough to Scale")
The architecture is considered foundation-ready when all are true:
- clear domain boundaries with no critical circular dependencies
- single canonical path for runtime orchestration, tool execution, and queue behavior
- curated release gate stable with low flakiness
- typed config convergence with controlled/explicit drift
- observability sufficient for incident diagnosis without reading source code
- SLO-aligned performance under expected load profiles
Execution Policy
- No feature work unless security-critical or production-critical.
- All architecture-affecting changes must update:
- closure done-definition
- release-gate evidence
- relevant ADR/rule docs
- Every refactor PR must include:
- boundary impact summary
- migration safety note
- gate test evidence
Completion Update (2026-02-28)
- Phase 0: Completed (audit + baseline published)
- Phase 1: Completed (rulebook + anti-drift checks active)
- Phase 2: Completed (direct
aso.serviceimports removed from runtime paths; facades enforce canonical access) - Phase 3: Completed (runtime observability snapshot and runbook operationalized)
- Phase 4: Completed (curated release gate + architecture guard checks documented/enforced)
Program now shifts from migration mode to maintenance mode:
- keep feature-freeze discipline for architecture-sensitive changes
- enforce anti-drift and release-gate checks on every high-impact PR